Hard-to-parse pages
Key service details appear only after interaction or inside images. We compare delivered and rendered HTML for important URLs.

LLM SEO
We check specific URLs to see whether important information is present in delivered HTML, remains accessible and has a clear structure. LLM SEO extends technical SEO by asking whether offers and terms are easy to find and understand in AI search.
Discuss your project ↗︎LLM SEO is useful when AI-powered search systems cannot reliably access key information or interpret its structure.
Key service details appear only after interaction or inside images. We compare delivered and rendered HTML for important URLs.
Product features, conditions and answers are spread across pages without clear connections. We review structure, internal links and canonical destination pages.
The same offer has different names or ambiguous abbreviations. We document where wording and page structure may lead to misunderstandings.
We document testable findings rather than speculative “LLM ranking factors”.
| Deliverable | What you receive |
|---|---|
| URL and HTML findings | Example pages with status codes, indexing signals, visible HTML and relevant structure issues. |
| Prioritised implementation tickets | Specific requirements for developers and editors, including affected URLs and acceptance checks. |
| Follow-up validation | A check of agreed changes on staging or live pages to confirm the content is actually accessible. |
We review technical accessibility, clearly identified services and the structure of important information for AI-powered search systems.
We review robots.txt, status codes and potential CDN or firewall blocks for search crawlers and user-initiated requests, including OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User, PerplexityBot, Claude-SearchBot and Claude-User. We assess model-training controls separately: GPTBot and ClaudeBot serve different purposes from search crawlers. Google-Extended and Applebot-Extended are additional usage controls, not switches for general search visibility.
We examine Terms and entities in relation to your goals and derive practical checks and recommendations.
We examine Structured content in relation to your goals and derive practical checks and recommendations.
We examine Quality review in relation to your goals and derive practical checks and recommendations.
Mentions and answers vary by system, question and time. We document observations; inclusion or citation cannot be guaranteed.
The technical foundation overlaps. Here we also check whether key claims, terms and relationships are easy to find and understand on the page.
An llms.txt file cannot replace accessible web pages and does not guarantee AI citations. We check HTML, internal links and crawling signals first. My practical test on llms.txt and traffic, linked below, explains the observations and limits of that analysis.
No. Appropriate markup can clarify content, but it must match what is visible on the page and cannot guarantee a mention.
The scope depends on page types, technology and depth of review. Once defined, you receive a proposal with clear URLs and deliverables.
Briefly describe your starting point. Together we identify a useful next step.